|
|
| Also listed in: Voter Protection |
Categories: African American Issues, Criminal Justice Reform, Senior Issues, Student Issues, Voter Rights, One Wisconsin Now - The "tOWN Hall"
In the wake of the 2004 election, Indiana passed a voter ID law, citing the need to preserve electoral integrity and curb the rampant voter fraud that allegedly happens during presidential elections - despite the fact that several studies have shown this problem simply doesn't exist in Indiana, here in Wisconsin, or on a national level at all, for that matter.
Several organizations representing historically disenfranchised groups - namely, African-Americans, senior citizens, and the working poor - challenged this law in the U.S. Supreme Court, saying that it unduly burdens a citizen's right to vote. You'd think the Supreme Court would reject an argument made by lawmakers that this legislation is necessary to protect democracy by targeting a problem that doesn't exist and disenfranchising thousands of people in the process.
But today, SCOTUS upheld Indiana's voter ID law on the grounds that it works neutrally towards ameliorating a problem that virtually doesn't exist. The racial, socioeconomic, and partisan dimensions to the effects of this law be damned. Indiana has done the right thing by protecting our constitutionally non-existent right to vote.
It's scary to think of the legal reinforcement a Wisconsin version of this bill has now received. Such a law in Wisconsin would disenfranchise half of our state's African-American population, at least 123,000 citizens without state-issued ID, and make it very difficult for those without driver's licenses to vote without access to adequately functioning registration offices. A 2005 study by the University of Wisconsin found that an estimated 23 percent of persons aged 65 and over do not have a Wisconsin drivers license or a photo ID. It also found that an estimated 98,247 Wisconsin residents ages 35 through 64 do not have either a drivers license or a photo ID.
The precedent laid down today ensures the fight to preserve more open and accessible elections won't be won in the courts - it will be won in the legislatures. We need to continue to show lawmakers that voter fraud is not a problem, and educate the public on the state of enfranchisement in Wisconsin so that we can ensure Wisconsin continues to enjoy a voter turnout rate that is 10% higher than most other states in the country.




















Continuing to educate and inform the public about the facts and absence of any organized fraud is important. But maintaining a Democratic majority in at least one house is key.
It absolutely burns me that you fools take this position that it will "disenfranchise".
Lie to yourselves, but don't lie to me.
I wish you would all jump off a cliff.
You Suck.
And by the way,
You're wrong. Dead Wrong.