http://www.onewisconsinnow.org/page/community/blog_rss/monicabennett Recently presidential candidate John McCain took a trip to Iowa where he visited some of the areas most damaged by the June flooding. McCain and crew ignored a request, from Iowa's governor, to forego the visit although Iowa officials feared the campaign visit may distract security from the state's massive flood recovery efforts. During his visit McCain took the opportunity to tell residents of an effected town "I am confident that there will be immediate relief". Perhaps McCain's confidence comes from knowing that support is available through the recent Water Resources Development Act, a bill passed last year. The Water Resources Development Act was passed in the Senate on November 9, 2007 with a Senate vote of 81-12. President Bush did veto the bill, but lawmakers were able to count enough votes to over-ride the veto. Both Democrats and Republicans chose to support this bill which appropriated $23 billion to critical projects including repairs to flood damage and wetland area, as well as preventing flooding to communities around the country. Among the small number of lawmakers opposing the bill included Senator McCain: although he was not present for the vote, McCain vocally opposed it . Last year McCain said that he opposed the $23 billion Water Resources Development Act because it included projects he considered wasteful. The program funds the production of levees and flood prevention programs which at the time of the vote McCain considered "pork". Today, thousands of Americans are still piecing together the remains from the early June floods. Instead of offering kind words to those most affected by natural disasters, maybe next time McCain will support positive legislation before the storm hits. http://www.onewisconsinnow.org/page/community/post/monicabennett/CHjR http://www.onewisconsinnow.org/page/community/post/monicabennett/CHjR/commentary#comments Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:24:12 EDT http://www.onewisconsinnow.org/page/community/post/monicabennett/CHjR Monica Monica 0 http://www.onewisconsinnow.org/page/community/comment_rss/CHjR/ It is no secret that men in the United States out-earn women. Forty-five years after the initial Equal Pay Act of 1963 women are still being paid significantly less than men who work in the same capacity. The most recent attempt, in the United States Senate, to provide protection to women workers was the Ledbetter Fair Pay Act: this legislation was not passed at the April vote. Throughout the years women have fought for and obtained significant rights including the right to vote and reproductive rights. After all of this time, why is the right to equal pay not a given right for women workers in the United States? One contributing factor to this on-going in-equality is the political under representation of women. Today in Washington, there are 74 women serving in the 435 seat House of Representative, and 16 women serving in the 100 seat Senate. Although women are not being voted for they are certainly voting. A 2004 Census Bureau Report showed that women out number men in voter eligibility, registration and actual ballots cast. The report states that 67.6% of females of voting age were registered to vote, compared with 64% of voting age males. From those registered to vote 60.1% of females did vote whereas only 56.3% of males casted ballots on election-day. As voters, it is our responsibility to elect officials who are representative to the population-which would include both men and women representative. Additionally, we must elect representatives who will promote fair and progressive legislation, starting with eliminating pay disparities between genders. http://www.onewisconsinnow.org/page/community/post/monicabennett/C27K http://www.onewisconsinnow.org/page/community/post/monicabennett/C27K/commentary#comments Tue, 10 Jun 2008 08:46:44 EDT http://www.onewisconsinnow.org/page/community/post/monicabennett/C27K Monica Monica 0 http://www.onewisconsinnow.org/page/community/comment_rss/C27K/